<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/plugins/rss-feed-styles/public/template.xsl"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:rssFeedStyles="http://www.lerougeliet.com/ns/rssFeedStyles#"
>

<channel>
	<title>Brain imaging and activation during posture and gait Archives - ISPGR</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ispgr.org/tag/brain-imaging-and-activation-during-posture-and-gait/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ispgr.org/tag/brain-imaging-and-activation-during-posture-and-gait/</link>
	<description>The International Society of Posture and Gait Research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2024 20:55:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
<rssFeedStyles:reader name="Digg Reader" url="http://digg.com/reader/search/https%3A%2F%2Fispgr.org%2Ffeed%2F"/><rssFeedStyles:reader name="Feedly" url="http://cloud.feedly.com/#subscription%2Ffeed%2Fhttps://ispgr.org/feed/"/><rssFeedStyles:reader name="Inoreader" url="http://www.inoreader.com/?add_feed=https%3A%2F%2Fispgr.org%2Ffeed%2F"/><rssFeedStyles:button name="Like" url="https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=%url%"/><rssFeedStyles:button name="G+" url="https://plus.google.com/share?url=%url%"/><rssFeedStyles:button name="Tweet" url="https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=%url%"/>	<item>
		<title>How does anxiety ‘set the stage’ for Freezing of Gait?</title>
		<link>https://ispgr.org/how-does-anxiety-set-the-stage-for-freezing-of-gait/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blog Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 11:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ISPGR Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain imaging and activation during posture and gait]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neurological diseases]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ispgr.org/?p=31859</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://ispgr.org/how-does-anxiety-set-the-stage-for-freezing-of-gait/">How does anxiety ‘set the stage’ for Freezing of Gait?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://ispgr.org">ISPGR</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_0 et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_0">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_0  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_0  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><p>By Kaylena Ehgoetz Martens</p>
<p>Freezing of gait is characterised by a sudden inability to initiate or continue walking which significantly impacts quality of life in people living with Parkinson’s disease. Since dopaminergic replacement therapy only partially ameliorates freezing of gait, other non-dopaminergic contributions may play a role in freezing of gait. There is evidence that sympathetic arousal increases prior to a freezing episode, particularly when freezing is triggered by stress. This highlights a potential neural mechanism to underpin the relationship between anxiety and freezing of gait. Despite a growing body of evidence that suggests anxiety may be a crucial contributor to freezing of gait, no research study has investigated changes in functional network architecture as a result of induced-anxiety which often triggers freezing of gait. Here, we aimed to investigate how anxiety-inducing contexts might ‘set the stage for freezing’, through the ascending arousal system, by examining an anxiety-inducing virtual reality gait paradigm inside functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).</p>
<p>We used a virtual reality gait paradigm to navigate a virtual plank that has been validated to elicit anxiety, whilst simultaneously collecting task-based fMRI data from individuals with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease with confirmed freezing of gait. First, we established that the threatening condition (i.e., navigating across a narrow plank above a deep pit) provoked more freezing when compared to the non-threatening condition. We established that the threatening condition was associated with heightened network integration. By utilizing a dynamic connectivity analysis, we identified patterns of increased ‘cross-talk’ within and between motor, limbic and cognitive networks in the threatening conditions. The sympathetic nature of this phenomenon was demonstrated by an increase in pupil dilation during the anxiety-inducing condition of the virtual reality gait paradigm outside of the MRI scanner.</p>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="wp-image-31862 size-large" src="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Fig-1-1024x489.jpg" alt="" width="1024" height="489" srcset="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Fig-1-1024x489.jpg 1024w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Fig-1-300x143.jpg 300w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Fig-1-768x367.jpg 768w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Fig-1-1080x516.jpg 1080w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Fig-1.jpg 1429w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /> Figure 1: Screenshots of the virtual-reality paradigm A) non-threatening and B) threatening walking conditions. C) Graphical representation of the noradrenergic Locus Coeruleus and its influence on pupil dilation. D) ‘Cross-talk’ model depicted graphically, with “cross-talk” visualized through heightened connectivity/network integration represented by the orange boldened lines, and its subsequent influences on the Striatum, which inhibits Globus Pallidus Internus (GPi), which inhibits the Mesencephalic Locomotor Regions (‘MLR’), leading to freezing of gait.</p>
<p>This work reveals a potential explanation for how anxiety could lead to freezing of gait. Heightened sympathetic arousal related to anxiety could increase ‘cross-talk’ between distributed cortical networks that ultimately manifest as episodes of freezing of gait. This research advances our understanding of a symptom that affects many people living with Parkinson’s disease and opens new avenues to explore for better clinical management.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Publication: <strong>Taylor, N.L., Wainstein, G., Quek, D., Lewis, S.J.G., Shine, J.M., Ehgoetz Martens, K.A. (2022) The contribution of noradrenergic activity to anxiety-induced freezing of gait. Movement Disorders, 37(7):1432-1443. </strong>DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.28999">10.1002/mds.28999</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_1">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_1  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_1  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h3>About the Author</h3></div>
			</div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_team_member et_pb_team_member_0 clearfix  et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_team_member_image et-waypoint et_pb_animation_off"><img decoding="async" width="2560" height="1707" src="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/kaylena-glasses-smiling2-scaled.jpg" alt="Kaylena Ehgoetz Martens" srcset="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/kaylena-glasses-smiling2-scaled.jpg 2560w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/kaylena-glasses-smiling2-300x200.jpg 300w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/kaylena-glasses-smiling2-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/kaylena-glasses-smiling2-768x512.jpg 768w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/kaylena-glasses-smiling2-1536x1024.jpg 1536w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/kaylena-glasses-smiling2-2048x1365.jpg 2048w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/kaylena-glasses-smiling2-1080x720.jpg 1080w" sizes="(max-width: 2560px) 100vw, 2560px" class="wp-image-31865" /></div>
				<div class="et_pb_team_member_description">
					<h4 class="et_pb_module_header">Kaylena Ehgoetz Martens</h4>
					<p class="et_pb_member_position">University of Waterloo, Canada</p>
					<div>Dr. Ehgoetz Martens combines movement kinematics, functional neuroimaging, psychophysiology and cognitive neuroscience to uncover the neural basis of gait and cognitive-emotional interactions in health and disease to improve early detection of neurodegeneration and innovate better strategies to assess and manage gait disturbances and falls in older adults and individuals at risk and/or suffering from neurodegenerative diseases. </div>
					
				</div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_1 et_pb_with_background et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_2">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_2  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_2  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h4><strong>Copyright</strong></h4>
<p>© 2021 by the author. Except as otherwise noted, the ISPGR blog, including its text and figures, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode</a>. </div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_3">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_3  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_3  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_dark">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h4><strong>ISPGR blog (ISSN 2561-4703) </strong></h4>
<p><strong>Are you interested in writing a blog post for the ISPGR website?  If so, please email the <a href="mailto:is&#112;&#103;&#114;&#64;&#105;&#115;&#112;gr&#46;or&#103;?subject=ISPGR%20Blog%20Post">ISGPR Secretariat </a>with the following information:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>First and Last Name</strong></li>
<li><strong>Institution/Affiliation</strong></li>
<li><strong>Paper you will be referencing</strong></li>
</ul></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://ispgr.org/how-does-anxiety-set-the-stage-for-freezing-of-gait/">How does anxiety ‘set the stage’ for Freezing of Gait?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://ispgr.org">ISPGR</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brain activation during walking: insights from conceptual models of brain aging</title>
		<link>https://ispgr.org/brain-activation-during-walking-insights-from-conceptual-models-of-brain-aging/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blog Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 03:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ISPGR Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain imaging and activation during posture and gait]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical Science]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ispgr.org/?p=29907</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://ispgr.org/brain-activation-during-walking-insights-from-conceptual-models-of-brain-aging/">Brain activation during walking: insights from conceptual models of brain aging</a> appeared first on <a href="https://ispgr.org">ISPGR</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_2 et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_4">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_4  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_4  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><p>By Dr Sudeshna Chatterjee</p>
<p>In the past several years, studies have shown that the prefrontal cortex &#8212; which has a crucial role in the control of executive functions including attention, working memory, and motor planning &#8212; is also involved in the neural control of walking. Mobile brain imaging approaches, such as functional near-infrared spectroscopy, allow us to measure prefrontal cortical activation during the performance of various walking tasks. While this is extremely valuable, an important yet unresolved challenge in the measurement and interpretation of brain activity during walking is the influence of inter-individual differences on brain activation. In our study, we address important knowledge gaps by investigating the extent to which prefrontal cortical activation during an obstacle negotiation task relative to typical steady state walking is explained by inter-individual differences in age, executive function, and sex in older adults. Furthermore, we present a novel perspective on the interpretation of prefrontal activation during walking based on a conceptual model of brain aging, the Compensation-Related Utilization of Neural Circuits Hypothesis (<em>CRUNCH</em>). Developed by Reuter-Lorenz and Cappell (2008), <em>CRUNCH</em> is a broader conceptual framework that consolidates several brain aging models including neural inefficiency, neural compensation, and capacity limitation.</p>
<p>We found that age, executive function, and their interaction are significant predictors of prefrontal activation during obstacle negotiation in older adults. Consistent with <em>CRUNCH</em>, among older adults of a younger age (&lt; 75 years), lower executive function was associated with <em>neural inefficiency</em> where greater recruitment of prefrontal activation was observed during obstacle negotiation compared to their peers with higher executive function (Panel A). In contrast, older adults of an advanced age (≥ 75 years) exhibited a <em>ceiling effect</em> of brain recruitment resources during obstacle negotiation regardless of executive function level (Panel B). Panels C and D show the conceptual interpretation of our data based on the CRUNCH framework. Finally, we found evidence of <em>compensatory overactivation</em>, where greater prefrontal activation was associated with a smaller drop in obstacle negotiation speed compared to typical steady state walking.</p>
<p>Our findings demonstrate that the interaction between task demands and individual characteristics may influence the functional range of brain activity available during complex walking and this should be considered by studies designed to intervene on brain activation efficiency to enhance walking ability in older adults. We suggest that future studies should measure activity from additional brain regions; design walking tasks with multiple gradations of difficulty; and include genetics and lifestyle as these variables may protect against or worsen mobility decline in older adults.</p>
<p><a href="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Chatterjee_ISPGR-blog_CRUNCH-Figure.tif"><img decoding="async" class="wp-image-29910 aligncenter size-medium" src="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Chatterjee_ISPGR-blog_CRUNCH-Figure.tif" alt="" width="undefined" height="undefined" /></a></p>
<div id="attachment_29911" style="width: 1034px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-29911" class="wp-image-29911 size-large" src="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Chatterjee_ISPGR-blog_CRUNCH-Figure-1024x850.jpg" alt="" width="1024" height="850" srcset="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Chatterjee_ISPGR-blog_CRUNCH-Figure-1024x850.jpg 1024w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Chatterjee_ISPGR-blog_CRUNCH-Figure-300x249.jpg 300w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Chatterjee_ISPGR-blog_CRUNCH-Figure-768x638.jpg 768w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Chatterjee_ISPGR-blog_CRUNCH-Figure-1536x1275.jpg 1536w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Chatterjee_ISPGR-blog_CRUNCH-Figure-1080x897.jpg 1080w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><p id="caption-attachment-29911" class="wp-caption-text">Figure 1: Panels A and B show the prefrontal activity data during typical steady state walking (Typical) and obstacle negotiation (Obstacles) in the early and late aging groups. Panels C and D show the conceptual interpretation of our data based on the Compensation-Related Utilization of Neural Circuits Hypothesis (CRUNCH) framework. EF denotes executive function. ΔO2Hb denotes the change in prefrontal activity during the walking period compared to the reference period for each task. ΔPFR denotes the change in prefrontal recruitment during Obstacles compared to Typical. Group differences in ΔPFR are reported as Cohen’s d.</p></div>
<p><img decoding="async" class="wp-image-29910 aligncenter size-medium" src="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Chatterjee_ISPGR-blog_CRUNCH-Figure.tif" alt="" width="undefined" height="undefined" /> This research was supported by a NIH/NIA R21 grant awarded to Dr. David J. Clark, Associate Professor at the University of Florida (The UPfront Walking Study).</p>
<p><strong>Publication</strong></p>
<p>Chatterjee SA, Seidler RD, Skinner JW, Lysne PE, Sumonthee C, Wu SS, Cohen RA, Rose DK, Woods AJ, Clark DJ. Obstacle negotiation in older adults: prefrontal activation interpreted through conceptual models of brain aging. <em>Innov Aging</em>. 2020;4(4):1-12. doi: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1093%2Fgeroni%2Figaa034">10.1093/geroni/igaa034</a>.</p></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_5">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_5  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_5  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h3>About the Author</h3></div>
			</div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_team_member et_pb_team_member_1 clearfix  et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_team_member_image et-waypoint et_pb_animation_off"><img decoding="async" width="358" height="449" src="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Sudeshna-Chatterjee_picture-for-ISPGR-blog-post.png" alt="Sudeshna A. Chatterjee, PT, PhD" srcset="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Sudeshna-Chatterjee_picture-for-ISPGR-blog-post.png 358w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Sudeshna-Chatterjee_picture-for-ISPGR-blog-post-239x300.png 239w" sizes="(max-width: 358px) 100vw, 358px" class="wp-image-29912" /></div>
				<div class="et_pb_team_member_description">
					<h4 class="et_pb_module_header">Sudeshna A. Chatterjee, PT, PhD</h4>
					<p class="et_pb_member_position">Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida</p>
					<div><p>Dr. Sudeshna Chatterjee is a Pepper OAIC Scholar and Postdoctoral Associate at the University of Florida. She is a licensed physical therapist with several years of experience in conducting gait research in older adults and adults post-stroke. She applies clinical, neurophysiological, and behavioral approaches to understand and enhance walking function.</p></div>
					<ul class="et_pb_member_social_links"><li><a href="https://twitter.com/SAChatterjee1" class="et_pb_font_icon et_pb_twitter_icon"><span>X</span></a></li></ul>
				</div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_3 et_pb_with_background et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_6">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_6  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_6  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h4><strong>Copyright</strong></h4>
<p>© 2020 by the author. Except as otherwise noted, the ISPGR blog, including its text and figures, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode</a>.</p></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_7">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_7  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_7  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_dark">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h4><strong>ISPGR blog (ISSN 2561-4703)<br />
</strong></h4>
<p><strong>Are you interested in writing a blog post for the ISPGR website?  If so, please email the <a href="mailto:i&#115;&#112;&#103;&#114;&#64;&#105;s&#112;gr&#46;o&#114;&#103;?subject=ISPGR%20Blog%20Post">ISGPR Secretariat </a>with the following information:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>First and Last Name</strong></li>
<li><strong>Institution/Affiliation</strong></li>
<li><strong>Paper you will be referencing</strong></li>
</ul></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://ispgr.org/brain-activation-during-walking-insights-from-conceptual-models-of-brain-aging/">Brain activation during walking: insights from conceptual models of brain aging</a> appeared first on <a href="https://ispgr.org">ISPGR</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using fNIRS in balance and gait studies: where to start?</title>
		<link>https://ispgr.org/using-fnirs-in-balance-and-gait-studies-where-to-start/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blog Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 03:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ISPGR Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain imaging and activation during posture and gait]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical Science]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ispgr.org/?p=29714</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://ispgr.org/using-fnirs-in-balance-and-gait-studies-where-to-start/">Using fNIRS in balance and gait studies: where to start?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://ispgr.org">ISPGR</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_4 et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_8">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_8  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_8  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><p>By Dr Jasmine Menant</p>
<p>As we are all well aware of, the study of postural control and gait is far from limited to biomechanics and motor control, but delves right into neuroscience and the role of cognition. Who has not heard about the seminal “Stops walking when talking” study (Lundin-Olsson et al, Lancet, 1997) and how it gave rise to an abundance of exciting research on the intimate relationship between cognition and motor control? The increased use of imaging technology, mostly magnetic resonance imaging but also more recently, functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has allowed significant advances in this area by allowing us to explore what is happening inside our brain as we stand or walk around.</p>
<p>A brief search on PubMed reveals that the number of publications involving fNIRS data collection in studies of balance and gait has jumped from approximately 3 papers published in 2010 to 39 papers published in the year 2020 alone. Yet, the lack of consistency in the analysis and reporting of fNIRS data across those studies is potentially a serious drawback to the expansion of knowledge as it precludes comparison and replications of studies. As a core group of ISPGR member users of fNIRS, we recognised this limitation and therefore took upon ourselves to form a taskforce to produce consensus evidence-based recommendations to try and standardize fNIRS research in the area of gait and posture. We reached out to other international experts in the field, and a collaboration of 23 colleagues from all around the Globe was soon formed. We reflected on our own experience and some key issues we had encountered in our experiments, and agreed on a structure to follow for the paper. As per the proverb “many hands make light work”, we split the work and each of us was either self-assigned to write a section and / or critically review one or more, emphasising an evidence-based approach. We then collated and integrated all the sections into a final concise document which was recently published in Gait &amp; Posture.</p>
<p>In brief, our paper is organised around 3 sections, first focusing on experimental protocols and hardware-related considerations; it then moves on to data processing and artefact control a-priori and post data collection, with detailed information of filtering techniques available. The last main section reviews outcome measures to consider and discusses the issues of validity and reliability of fNIRS data in the posture and gait research area. The concluding paragraphs emphasise the need for transparency in the reporting of data and data sharing. We have supplemented the main text with explanatory figures, a summary table and, in the appendix, a detailed checklist of items to consider when processing and reporting fNIRS data collected in balance and gait experiments.</p>
<p>To conclude, our intention with this paper is by no means to negate or prevent the development of new evidence on fNIRS in the gait and posture field. Rather, we hope that our set of research guidelines can be used by clinicians and researchers alike to lead novel and impactful research using fNIRS in standardized and transparent approaches.</p>
<div id="attachment_29732" style="width: 713px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-29732" class="wp-image-29732 size-full" src="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Fig_blog.jpg" alt="" width="703" height="392" srcset="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Fig_blog.jpg 703w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Fig_blog-300x167.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 703px) 100vw, 703px" /><p id="caption-attachment-29732" class="wp-caption-text">Example of fNIRS data collection during a stepping reaction time task.</p></div>
<p><strong>Publication</strong></p>
<p><a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32987345/">Menant JC, Maidan I, Alcock L, Al-Yahya E, Cerasa A, Clark DJ, de Bruin ED, Fraser S, Gramigna V, Hamacher D, Herold F, Holtzer R, Izzetoglu M, Lim S, Pantall A, Pelicioni P, Peters S, Rosso AL, St George R, Stuart S, Vasta R, Vitorio R, Mirelman A. <em>A consensus guide to using functional near-infrared spectroscopy in posture and gait research</em>.</a> Gait Posture. 2020 Sep 18;82:254-265.</p>
<p><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.09.012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.09.012</a></p></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_9">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_9  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_9  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h3>About the Author</h3></div>
			</div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_team_member et_pb_team_member_2 clearfix  et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_team_member_image et-waypoint et_pb_animation_off"><img decoding="async" width="2173" height="2560" src="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/jasmine-scaled.jpg" alt="Jasmine Menant " srcset="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/jasmine-scaled.jpg 2173w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/jasmine-255x300.jpg 255w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/jasmine-869x1024.jpg 869w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/jasmine-768x905.jpg 768w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/jasmine-1304x1536.jpg 1304w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/jasmine-1738x2048.jpg 1738w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/jasmine-1080x1272.jpg 1080w" sizes="(max-width: 2173px) 100vw, 2173px" class="wp-image-29724" /></div>
				<div class="et_pb_team_member_description">
					<h4 class="et_pb_module_header">Jasmine Menant </h4>
					<p class="et_pb_member_position">Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney </p>
					<div><p>PhD, Research Fellow in the Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre.</p>
<p>Research interests:  mechanistic studies and clinical trials around postural instability and falls in older people and clinical groups with balance problems .</p></div>
					
				</div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_5 et_pb_with_background et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_10">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_10  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_10  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h4><strong>Copyright</strong></h4>
<p>© 2020 by the author. Except as otherwise noted, the ISPGR blog, including its text and figures, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode</a>.</p></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_11">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_11  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_11  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_dark">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h4><strong>ISPGR blog (ISSN 2561-4703)<br />
</strong></h4>
<p><strong>Are you interested in writing a blog post for the ISPGR website?  If so, please email the <a href="mailto:i&#115;&#112;&#103;&#114;&#64;&#105;s&#112;gr&#46;o&#114;&#103;?subject=ISPGR%20Blog%20Post">ISGPR Secretariat </a>with the following information:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>First and Last Name</strong></li>
<li><strong>Institution/Affiliation</strong></li>
<li><strong>Paper you will be referencing</strong></li>
</ul></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://ispgr.org/using-fnirs-in-balance-and-gait-studies-where-to-start/">Using fNIRS in balance and gait studies: where to start?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://ispgr.org">ISPGR</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>You are free to walk! Measuring cortical activity out of the scanner during locomotor tasks.</title>
		<link>https://ispgr.org/you-are-free-to-walk/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blog Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 04:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ISPGR Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain imaging and activation during posture and gait]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitive impairments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ispgr.org/?p=29050</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://ispgr.org/you-are-free-to-walk/">You are free to walk! Measuring cortical activity out of the scanner during locomotor tasks.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://ispgr.org">ISPGR</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_6 et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_12">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_12  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_12  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><p>By Paulo Pelicioni.</p>
<p>Over the last decade, the development of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has enabled posture and gait researchers to investigate cortical activity when participants are moving freely in the laboratory. Most of the work has focused on the prefrontal cortex (PFC) because there is good evidence that executive function, a main function of this brain region, is involved in the control of gait. Although some high-quality reviews on fNIRS during locomotor tasks have been published, they either primarily focused on methodological aspects or were not systematic. We therefore conducted a systematic review to: (i) summarize the published research on PFC activation patterns during simple and complex walking tasks in young adults, older adults and clinical groups with balance disorders using fNIRS; (ii) evaluate each included study based on methodological criteria important for good data quality.</p>
<p>We conducted searches in June 2018 using four databases (Embase, PubMed, Scopus and PsycINFO). To be included, the papers had to meet the following criteria: (i) used fNIRS to measure PFC activation patterns; (ii) included walking tasks; and (iii) assessed young people, older people and/or clinical groups with balance disorders. We followed the PRISMA guidelines to report our findings. The search retrieved 308 studies of which 35 studies met our inclusion criteria. We classified 30 studies as high and medium quality (Figure, panel A) according to our six methodological criteria (Figure, panel B). Close to 2/3 of the studies involving healthy groups (young and older people) and most of the studies involving clinical groups with balance disorders reported increased PFC activation with increasing walking task complexity. In addition, dual-tasks paradigms involving verbal fluency and arithmetic secondary tasks during walking were more likely to report increased PFC activation compared with paradigms involving secondary visual search tasks.</p>
<div class="mceTemp"> </div>
<p>Based on the consistent findings of increased PFC activation during complex walking tasks in clinical groups with balance disorders, we suggest that these individuals might require additional attentional resources for safe ambulation in complex environments. In addition, our results confirm that PFC activation is modulated by the type of secondary task performed during the walk. The studies conducted in healthy groups of young and older adults showed inconsistent findings; we suspect that this might be because of the variety of protocols used for data collection and analysis (Figure, panel B). We therefore urge researchers in the field to unite in a task-force to provide recommendations to standardise fNIRS protocols.</p>
<div id="attachment_29053" style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-29053" class="wp-image-29053" src="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/figure-300x225.png" alt="" width="500" height="375" srcset="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/figure-300x225.png 300w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/figure-768x576.png 768w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/figure-1024x768.png 1024w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/figure-1080x810.png 1080w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><p id="caption-attachment-29053" class="wp-caption-text">Percentage of included studies which qualified the overall (A) and individual (B) methodological reporting criteria. Data are presented as % of total included studies (n=35).</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Publication</strong></p>
<p>Pelicioni PHS, Tijsma M, Lord SR, Menant J. 2019. Prefrontal cortical activation measured by fNIRS during walking: effects of age, disease and secondary task. PeerJ 7:e6833 <a href="http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6833">http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6833</a></p></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_13">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_13  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_13  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h3>About the Author</h3></div>
			</div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_team_member et_pb_team_member_3 clearfix  et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_team_member_image et-waypoint et_pb_animation_off"><img decoding="async" width="400" height="400" src="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/fnirspic.jpg" alt="Paulo Henrique Silva Pelicioni " srcset="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/fnirspic.jpg 400w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/fnirspic-150x150.jpg 150w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/fnirspic-300x300.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px" class="wp-image-29059" /></div>
				<div class="et_pb_team_member_description">
					<h4 class="et_pb_module_header">Paulo Henrique Silva Pelicioni </h4>
					<p class="et_pb_member_position">Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia and School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales.</p>
					<div><p>Paulo is a PhD Candidate at the School of Public Health and Community Medicine (UNSW) and Neuroscience Research Australia. He is a physiotherapist who undertakes interdisciplinary research at the intersection of physiotherapy, medical science and public health, with a main focus on ageing and Parkinson&#8217;s disease.</p></div>
					<ul class="et_pb_member_social_links"><li><a href="https://twitter.com/PauloPelicioni" class="et_pb_font_icon et_pb_twitter_icon"><span>X</span></a></li><li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/paulo-henrique-silva-pelicioni-69b5138b/" class="et_pb_font_icon et_pb_linkedin_icon"><span>LinkedIn</span></a></li></ul>
				</div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_7 et_pb_with_background et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_14">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_14  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_14  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h4><strong>Copyright</strong></h4>
<p>© 2019 by the author. Except as otherwise noted, the ISPGR blog, including its text and figures, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode</a>.</p></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_15">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_15  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_15  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_dark">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h4><strong>ISPGR blog (ISSN 2561-4703)<br />
</strong></h4>
<p><strong>Are you interested in writing a blog post for the ISPGR website?  If so, please email the <a href="mailto:isp&#103;r&#64;i&#115;p&#103;r.&#111;rg?subject=ISPGR%20Blog%20Post">ISGPR Secretariat </a>with the following information:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>First and Last Name</strong></li>
<li><strong>Institution/Affiliation</strong></li>
<li><strong>Paper you will be referencing</strong></li>
</ul></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://ispgr.org/you-are-free-to-walk/">You are free to walk! Measuring cortical activity out of the scanner during locomotor tasks.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://ispgr.org">ISPGR</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do walking and cognition share the same functional brain networks?</title>
		<link>https://ispgr.org/do-walking-and-cognition-share-the-same-functional-brain-networks/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PodiumAdmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 22:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ISPGR Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basic Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain imaging and activation during posture and gait]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitive impairments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ispgr.org/?p=802</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://ispgr.org/do-walking-and-cognition-share-the-same-functional-brain-networks/">Do walking and cognition share the same functional brain networks?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://ispgr.org">ISPGR</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_8 et_section_regular section_has_divider et_pb_bottom_divider" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_16">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_16  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_16  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><p>Walking is a common yet complex activity. Accumulating evidence suggests that walking is not fully autonomous, and instead, relies upon considerable cognitive input and its underlying cortical structures. We now know that the brain is organized into distinct functional networks comprised of spatially separated, yet functionally connected regions. However, it remains unclear whether and how these functional brain networks are involved in the control of walking. Besides, walking has distinct features such as gait speed and gait variability. Is it possible that these features are controlled by distinct functional brain networks? If so, in what way? In this study, we start to answer some of these questions by using a neuroimaging technique that evaluates connectivity between brain regions that share functional properties; namely, resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI).</p>
<p>Twelve older adults with relatively slow walking speed and mild-to-moderate cognitive impairment, yet without overt neurological disease, completed a gait assessment and a rs-fMRI visit. Preferred gait speed (m/s) and gait variability (%, coefficient of variation of stride time) were evaluated. Functional connectivity <em>within</em> and <em>between</em> seven known functional brain networks was estimated and compared to gait outcomes. We discovered that gait speed and variability were linked to distinct networks (see Figure). Specifically, gait speed was correlated with the strength of functional connectivity within the fronto-parietal network, suggesting that this gait feature depends upon the integrity of communication within brain regions linked to executive functions. Gait variability, on the other hand, correlated with the degree to which spontaneous brain activity within the dorsal attention network and the default network were <em>anti-correlated</em>. This suggests that one’s gait variability, or steadiness of walking, may depend upon the capacity of the brain to dissociate the neural activity of these two networks—a capacity that has been closely linked to sustained attention.</p>
<p>This small study demonstrated for the first time that clinically-meaningful gait features are linked to the functional integrity of distinct brain networks. Future studies are warranted to 1) examine these relationships in other populations such as Alzheimer’s disease or related dementias, and 2) determine if gait speed and variability can be differentially targeted by non-invasive brain stimulation. These results, while preliminary, also suggest that clinicians should treat gait speed and variability as distinct features of locomotor control that are controlled by cognitive functions.</p>
<p><strong><img decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-806" src="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/LoFigure.png" alt="" width="663" height="470" srcset="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/LoFigure.png 663w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/LoFigure-300x213.png 300w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/LoFigure-400x284.png 400w" sizes="(max-width: 663px) 100vw, 663px" />Figure. </strong>Gait speed (A, C) and gait variability (B, D) are linked to distinct functional brain networks in functionally-limited older adults. In particular, gait speed is significantly linked to functional connectivity <em>within</em> the frontoparietal network (A, upper left, shown in red). Gait variability is significantly linked to functional connectivity <em>between </em>the dorsal attention network and the default network (D, lower right, shown in red).</p>
<p><strong>Publication</strong></p>
<p>Lo O, Halko MA, Zhou J, Harrison R, Lipsitz LA, Manor B (2017). Gait speed and gait variability are associated with different functional brain networks. <em>Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience</em>, 9:390. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00390/full</p></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_17">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_17  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_17  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h3>About the Author</h3></div>
			</div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_team_member et_pb_team_member_4 clearfix  et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_team_member_image et-waypoint et_pb_animation_off"><img decoding="async" width="189" height="187" src="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Lee.png" alt="On-Yee “Amy” Lo, PT, PhD" class="wp-image-805" /></div>
				<div class="et_pb_team_member_description">
					<h4 class="et_pb_module_header">On-Yee “Amy” Lo, PT, PhD</h4>
					<p class="et_pb_member_position">Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Harvard Medical School</p>
					<div><p>Amy was first trained as a physical therapist followed by graduate trainings in biomechanics and neuroscience. She is currently a post-doctoral research fellow in the Harvard Translational Research in Aging Program. Her career goal is to understand the neural control of locomotion and to translate research findings to enhance functional independence in older adults.</p></div>
					
				</div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				<div class="et_pb_bottom_inside_divider et-no-transition"></div>
			</div><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_9 et_pb_with_background et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_18">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_18  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_18  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h4><strong>Copyright</strong></h4>
<p>© 2018 by the author. Except as otherwise noted, the ISPGR blog, including its text and figures, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode</a>.</p></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_19 et_animated">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_19  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_19  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_dark">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h4><strong>ISPGR blog (ISSN 2561-4703)<br />
</strong></h4>
<p><strong>Are you interested in writing a blog post for the ISPGR website?  If so, please email the <a href="mailto:i&#115;pg&#114;&#64;&#105;sp&#103;&#114;.&#111;r&#103;?subject=ISPGR%20Blog%20Post">ISGPR Secretariat </a>with the following information:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>First and Last Name</strong></li>
<li><strong>Institution/Affiliation</strong></li>
<li><strong>Paper you will be referencing</strong></li>
</ul></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://ispgr.org/do-walking-and-cognition-share-the-same-functional-brain-networks/">Do walking and cognition share the same functional brain networks?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://ispgr.org">ISPGR</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does the supplementary motor area and cerebellum play distinct roles in gait initiation process?</title>
		<link>https://ispgr.org/does-the-supplementary-motor-area-and-cerebellum-play-distinct-roles-in-gait-initiation-process/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PodiumAdmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 21:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ISPGR Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basic Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain imaging and activation during posture and gait]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sensorimotor control]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ispgr.org/?p=776</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://ispgr.org/does-the-supplementary-motor-area-and-cerebellum-play-distinct-roles-in-gait-initiation-process/">Does the supplementary motor area and cerebellum play distinct roles in gait initiation process?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://ispgr.org">ISPGR</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_10 et_section_regular section_has_divider et_pb_bottom_divider" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_20">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_20  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_20  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><p>In humans, gait initiation is particularly challenging for motor and postural control. While standing on only two legs, we have to move our whole body forward and pass from a (relatively) stable (double leg stance) to an (very!) unstable position (single leg stance). This process is associated with anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs). The neural substrates for generating these APAs and initiating a step are not fully known. By applying repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), we can manipulate APAs. Previous research showed that rTMS applied above the supplementary motor area provokes a shortening of the APA duration of the first step with no change in APA amplitude and rTMS applied over the cerebellum affects spatial characteristics of walking during locomotor adaptation. This study extends this research further by looking at the effects of supplementary motor area and cerebellar stimulation on the generation of APAs and gait initiation.</p>
<p>We selectively disrupted the supplementary motor area and cerebellum with continuous theta burst rTMS (cTBS, 600 stimuli, three-pulse bursts at 50 Hz, repeated every 200 ms continuously for 40 s-5 Hz) and evaluated the effects of the stimulation on the APAs and execution phases of gait initiation. We recorded biomechanical parameters of gait initiation and EMG activity of the lower leg muscles in 22 healthy volunteers. Our volunteers were instructed to walk at their usual self-paced speed for 10 trials before and after rTMS. They performed separate sessions in a randomised order for rTMS over the supplementary motor area, cerebellum and sham stimulation (to either supplementary motor area or cerebellum), the sessions being separated at least 7 days. We found that functional inhibition of the supplementary motor area led to a shortened APA phase duration with advanced and increased muscle activity. During execution, it also advanced muscle co-activation and decreased the duration of stance soleus activity. Functional inhibition of the cerebellum on the other hand did not influence the APA phase duration and amplitude. During execution, it did increase muscle co-activation and decreased execution duration with increased swing soleus muscle duration and activity. Neither SMA nor cerebellar functional inhibition provoked significant changes in the step length and velocity or postural control during gait execution (i.e. double stance duration and braking index).</p>
<p>The results support distinct roles for the supplementary motor area and the lateral posterior cerebellum in human gait initiation. The supplementary motor area is important for the timing and amplitude of the preparatory phase of the gait initiation, and the posterior cerebellum contributes to the inter- and intra-limb muscle coordination, and probably coupling between the APAs and the execution phases. This study enhances our understanding of how the cortico-pontine-cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathway contributes to the preparation and the execution of the first step in humans.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-764" src="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/WelterFigure.png" alt="" width="652" height="477" srcset="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/WelterFigure.png 652w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/WelterFigure-300x219.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 652px) 100vw, 652px" /></p>
<p>Figure – Effects of cTBS SMA and sham stimulation on gait initiation in an individual subject. Note that after SMA stimulation (left panel) the duration of the anticipatory postural adjustments phase (delay between t0 and FC) decreased with an advanced TA muscle activity. Such is not the case after sham stimulation (right panel).</p>
<h2>Publication</h2>
<p>Richard A, Van Hamme A, Drevelle X, Golmard JL, Meunier S, Welter ML. Contribution of the supplementary motor area and the cerebellum to the anticipatory postural adjustments and execution phases of human gait initiation. Neuroscience. 2017 Sep 1;358:181-189. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.06.047. Epub 2017 Jul 1. PMID: 28673716 (<a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306452217304529?via%3Dihub">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306452217304529?via%3Dihub</a>)</p></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_21">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_21  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_21  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h3>About the Author</h3></div>
			</div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_team_member et_pb_team_member_5 clearfix  et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_team_member_image et-waypoint et_pb_animation_off"><img decoding="async" width="185" height="187" src="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Welter.png" alt="Marie-Laure Welter" class="wp-image-763" /></div>
				<div class="et_pb_team_member_description">
					<h4 class="et_pb_module_header">Marie-Laure Welter</h4>
					<p class="et_pb_member_position">Professor of Medicine, Chair of Physiology at Rouen-Normandie University</p>
					<div><p>Marie-Laure Welter is Professor of Medicine, Chair of Physiology at Rouen-Normandie University, and head of the Neurophysiology Unit at the University Hospital Rouen-Normandie (France).  Her research program is devoted to the understanding of the pathophysiology of complex movement disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease, essential tremor or dystonia, at the Brain and Spine Institute-French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (ICM/INSERM) . Her overarching aim is to identify new therapeutic targets, especially in the field of functional neurosurgery and gait and balance disorders, with a combined clinical and electrophysiological approach.</p></div>
					
				</div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				<div class="et_pb_bottom_inside_divider et-no-transition"></div>
			</div><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_11 et_pb_with_background et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_22">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_22  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_22  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h4><strong>Copyright</strong></h4>
<p>© 2018 by the author. Except as otherwise noted, the ISPGR blog, including its text and figures, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode</a>.</p></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_23 et_animated">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_23  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_23  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_dark">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h4><strong>ISPGR blog (ISSN 2561-4703)<br />
</strong></h4>
<p><strong>Are you interested in writing a blog post for the ISPGR website?  If so, please email the <a href="mailto:&#105;&#115;&#112;g&#114;&#64;i&#115;&#112;&#103;&#114;&#46;&#111;&#114;g?subject=ISPGR%20Blog%20Post">ISGPR Secretariat </a>with the following information:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>First and Last Name</strong></li>
<li><strong>Institution/Affiliation</strong></li>
<li><strong>Paper you will be referencing</strong></li>
</ul></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://ispgr.org/does-the-supplementary-motor-area-and-cerebellum-play-distinct-roles-in-gait-initiation-process/">Does the supplementary motor area and cerebellum play distinct roles in gait initiation process?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://ispgr.org">ISPGR</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speeding up during gait :The workings of our neuromuscular transmission system</title>
		<link>https://ispgr.org/speeding-up-during-gait-the-workings-of-our-neuromuscular-transmission-system/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PodiumAdmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ISPGR Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basic Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain imaging and activation during posture and gait]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sensorimotor control]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ispgr.org/?p=771</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://ispgr.org/speeding-up-during-gait-the-workings-of-our-neuromuscular-transmission-system/">Speeding up during gait :The workings of our neuromuscular transmission system</a> appeared first on <a href="https://ispgr.org">ISPGR</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_12 et_section_regular section_has_divider et_pb_bottom_divider" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_24">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_24  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_24  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><p>Both animals and humans can change their gait speed over a wide range to suit the situation. The coordinated locomotor muscle activity among various speeds is mainly generated by the spinal central pattern generators (CPGs). Recent animal studies have demonstrated the following two characteristics of the speed control mechanisms of the spinal CPGs: (i) rostral spinal segment activation is essential to achieving high-speed locomotion; and (ii) different spinal neural modules are sequentially activated with increasing speed. To examine whether similar control mechanisms exist in the spinal cord of humans, we estimated spinal neural activity during varied-speed locomotion from surface electromyographic (EMG) signals.</p>
<p>We recorded EMG activity from 14 lower leg muscles during a range of speeds (from very slow walking [0.3 m/s] to fast running [4.3 m/s]). We estimated spinal neural activity by mapping the EMG activations onto the estimated location in the spinal cord based on innervation relationships between muscles and spinal segments (Fig. 1A-2). We then broke down the spinal activities into fundamental units of the activity generated by each locomotor module (i.e., muscle synergy) (Fig. 1A-3). We found that the reconstructed spinal activity patterns were divided into the following three patterns depending on the locomotion speed: slow walking, fast walking and running (Fig.1B, the first column). During these three activation patterns, the activity in rostral segments was more increased than that in caudal segments as speed increased. Additionally, the different spinal activation patterns were generated by distinct combinations of locomotor modules (Fig.1B, second and subsequent columns). Most modules newly recruited in fast walking and running were activated by the upper lumbar segments.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-767" src="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/YokoyamaFigure.png" alt="" width="661" height="699" srcset="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/YokoyamaFigure.png 661w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/YokoyamaFigure-284x300.png 284w" sizes="(max-width: 661px) 100vw, 661px" /></p>
<p>Figure 1. (A) Procedures of reconstruction of spinal activity patterns from surface EMG signals. (B) Reconstructed spinal activity patterns (the first column) are divided into several locomotor modules (second and subsequent columns from the left) at slow walking, fast walking and running. The locomotor modules were obtained by non-negative matrix factorization method. Muscle weighting component (top bars) and its corresponding temporal pattern component (the same color waveform) for each locomotor module is also shown in the figure.</p>
<p>To summarize the results, we found the following spinal activation patterns regarding speed control of human locomotion: (i) spinal activity in the rostral segments increased compared with the caudal segments with increasing locomotion speed; and (ii) the different spinal activation patterns recruited distinct combinations of locomotor modules. These results are consistent with the speed control characteristics of vertebrate CPGs. This commonality supports a hypothesis that basic locomotor neural circuits are highly conserved among in humans, mammals, and birds over vertebrate evolution. Our results provide fascinating insight into not only human locomotor control but also the evolution of vertebrate locomotion.</p>
<p><strong>Publication</strong></p>
<p>Yokoyama H, Ogawa T, Shinya M, Kawashima N, Nakazawa K (2017). Speed dependency in α-motoneuron activity and locomotor modules in human locomotion: indirect evidence for phylogenetically conserved spinal circuits. Proc Roy Soc B. 284(1851), 20170290. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0290.<br />
Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0290</p></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_25">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_25  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_25  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h3>About the Author</h3></div>
			</div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_team_member et_pb_team_member_6 clearfix  et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_team_member_image et-waypoint et_pb_animation_off"><img decoding="async" width="186" height="188" src="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Yokoyama.png" alt="Hikaru Yokoyama" class="wp-image-766" /></div>
				<div class="et_pb_team_member_description">
					<h4 class="et_pb_module_header">Hikaru Yokoyama</h4>
					<p class="et_pb_member_position">Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo</p>
					<div><p>His research interests are the neural control mechanisms of locomotion in humans. He is currently studying on the cortical control of locomotor muscle activity using machine learning and electrophysiological techniques.</p></div>
					
				</div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				<div class="et_pb_bottom_inside_divider et-no-transition"></div>
			</div><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_13 et_pb_with_background et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_26">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_26  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_26  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h4><strong>Copyright</strong></h4>
<p>© 2018 by the author. Except as otherwise noted, the ISPGR blog, including its text and figures, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode</a>.</p></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_27 et_animated">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_27  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_27  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_dark">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h4><strong>ISPGR blog (ISSN 2561-4703)<br />
</strong></h4>
<p><strong>Are you interested in writing a blog post for the ISPGR website?  If so, please email the <a href="mailto:is&#112;gr&#64;ispg&#114;.&#111;rg?subject=ISPGR%20Blog%20Post">ISGPR Secretariat </a>with the following information:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>First and Last Name</strong></li>
<li><strong>Institution/Affiliation</strong></li>
<li><strong>Paper you will be referencing</strong></li>
</ul></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://ispgr.org/speeding-up-during-gait-the-workings-of-our-neuromuscular-transmission-system/">Speeding up during gait :The workings of our neuromuscular transmission system</a> appeared first on <a href="https://ispgr.org">ISPGR</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two legs, one brain: interhemispheric neuroanatomy is critical for postural control adaptation</title>
		<link>https://ispgr.org/two-legs-one-brain-interhemispheric-neuroanatomy-is-critical-for-postural-control-adaptation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PodiumAdmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 21:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ISPGR Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adaptation learning plasticity and compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basic Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain imaging and activation during posture and gait]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ispgr.org/?p=758</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://ispgr.org/two-legs-one-brain-interhemispheric-neuroanatomy-is-critical-for-postural-control-adaptation/">Two legs, one brain: interhemispheric neuroanatomy is critical for postural control adaptation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://ispgr.org">ISPGR</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_14 et_section_regular section_has_divider et_pb_bottom_divider" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_28">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_28  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_28  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><p>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by central nervous system white matter lesions that affect people’s ability to move independently. Further, people with MS often report significant asymmetries in muscle strength and function in the left versus the right leg. These are often associated with increased postural sway (i.e. worse balance) and less symmetrical stepping patterns during walking (i.e. worse walking). It is no surprise that such lower limb asymmetries are frequently associated with poorer balance control, falls, and reduced quality of life. Currently there is limited understanding as to why these limb asymmetries exist in MS and which areas within the central nervous system contribute to these mobility-limiting issues. It is also unknown whether improving these lower limb asymmetries may concomitantly improve balance and mobility during activities of daily living.</p>
<p>To address these questions, participants stood on a platform and tried to maintain their balance while the  platform continually slid forward and backward at a fixed frequency of differing amplitudes. We measured their ability to anticipate changes in direction (i.e. temporal performance) and their ability to control the amplitude of sway (i.e. spatial performance) with repeated exposures to this moving platform. To understand the neural underpinnings of postural motor learning, we correlated the acquisition and retention of practice-related improvements in postural control to brain white matter microstructural integrity acquired via diffusion weighted magnetic resonance images using a tract-based spatial statistical approach. Despite having worse postural control than control participants, those with MS exhibited improvements in temporal performance (over one day of practice) and retention (ability to maintain improvements 24 hours later) in a similar manner as control participants. Improvements in temporal performance were directly correlated to microstructural integrity of white matter tracts in the corpus callosum, posterior parieto-sensorimotor fibers and the brainstem in people with MS. Within the corpus callosum, fibers connecting the primary motor cortices (red fibers in <strong>Figure 1)</strong>were most strongly correlated to temporal improvements in postural control, in contrast to those connecting pre-supplementary or supplementary motor areas (yellow and orange fibers in <strong>Figure 1</strong>).</p>
<p>For movements that require precise coordination between the two sides of the body (e.g. walking, postural control of balance, typing) a delicate balance of excitation and inhibition is required between the right and left sensorimotor cortices. This interhemispheric communication is principally accomplished through the corpus callosum. Reduced quality of the corpus callosum is common in people with MS and has been directly related to poorer communication between the two sides of the brain and upper extremity motor performance. We suggest that impairments in gait and balance control are also, at least in part, a result of reduced structure and altered communication between the two sides of the brain in people with MS. However, our understanding of how changes in communication between the two sides of the brain contribute to lower limb asymmetries and the resultant declines in mobility for those with MS remains incomplete.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-760" src="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/FlingFigure.png" alt="" width="416" height="352" srcset="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/FlingFigure.png 416w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/FlingFigure-300x254.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 416px) 100vw, 416px" /></p>
<p><strong>Figure 1 – </strong>Interhemispheric white matter fiber tracts connecting the right and left pre-supplementary motor areas (yellow), supplementary motor areas (orange), and primary motor cortices (red).</p>
<p><strong>Copyright:</strong></p>
<p>The ISPGR blog applied Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license to figure and text of the article.</p>
<p><a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/</a></p>
<p><strong>Publication:</strong></p>
<p>Daniel S. Peterson, Geetanjali Gera, Fay B. Horak, Brett W. Fling. Corpus Callosum Structural Integrity Is Associated With Postural Control Improvement in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis Who Have Minimal Disability. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol 31, Issue 4, pp. 343 – 353</p>
<p><a href="http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1545968316680487">http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1545968316680487</a></p></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_29">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_29  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_29  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h3>About the Author</h3></div>
			</div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_team_member et_pb_team_member_7 clearfix  et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_team_member_image et-waypoint et_pb_animation_off"><img decoding="async" width="185" height="196" src="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Fling.png" alt="Brett W. Fling, Ph.D." class="wp-image-759" /></div>
				<div class="et_pb_team_member_description">
					<h4 class="et_pb_module_header">Brett W. Fling, Ph.D.</h4>
					<p class="et_pb_member_position">Director – Sensorimotor Neuroimaging Laboratory. Colorado State University</p>
					<div><p>Brett W. Fling, Ph.D. Assistant Professor – Health and Exercise Science Department &amp; Molecular, Cellular &amp; Integrative Neurosciences Program. Director – Sensorimotor Neuroimaging Laboratory. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.</p>
<p>Research within the Sensorimotor Neuroimaging Laboratory at Colorado State University is designed to understand the contributions of the brain’s structural and functional neural networks to everyday movements. We leverage this understanding of the nervous system to develop new therapeutic interventions for individuals with sensorimotor dysfunction. Our laboratory utilizes a range of neuroimaging techniques including functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, electroencephalography, and transcranial magnetic stimulation to assess neuroanatomy and neurophysiologic function. These state of the art imaging techniques are integrated with experimental paradigms relying on the biomechanical analysis of sensorimotor control to provide a comprehensive view of the neural control of movement.</p></div>
					
				</div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				<div class="et_pb_bottom_inside_divider et-no-transition"></div>
			</div><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_15 et_pb_with_background et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_30">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_30  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_30  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h4><strong>Copyright</strong></h4>
<p>© 2018 by the author. Except as otherwise noted, the ISPGR blog, including its text and figures, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode</a>.</p></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_31 et_animated">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_31  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_31  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_dark">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h4><strong>ISPGR blog (ISSN 2561-4703)<br />
</strong></h4>
<p><strong>Are you interested in writing a blog post for the ISPGR website?  If so, please email the <a href="mailto:&#105;&#115;&#112;&#103;r&#64;&#105;&#115;&#112;&#103;&#114;&#46;&#111;&#114;g?subject=ISPGR%20Blog%20Post">ISGPR Secretariat </a>with the following information:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>First and Last Name</strong></li>
<li><strong>Institution/Affiliation</strong></li>
<li><strong>Paper you will be referencing</strong></li>
</ul></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://ispgr.org/two-legs-one-brain-interhemispheric-neuroanatomy-is-critical-for-postural-control-adaptation/">Two legs, one brain: interhemispheric neuroanatomy is critical for postural control adaptation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://ispgr.org">ISPGR</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does an active brain predict falls in high-functioning older adults?</title>
		<link>https://ispgr.org/does-an-active-brain-predict-falls-in-high-functioning-older-adults/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PodiumAdmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 20:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ISPGR Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain imaging and activation during posture and gait]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cognitive motor interfrence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ispgr.org/?p=754</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://ispgr.org/does-an-active-brain-predict-falls-in-high-functioning-older-adults/">Does an active brain predict falls in high-functioning older adults?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://ispgr.org">ISPGR</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_16 et_section_regular section_has_divider et_pb_bottom_divider" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_32">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_32  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_32  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><p>Falls are increasingly prevalent with advancing age and the consequences are often devastating, resulting in loss of independence, institutionalization and premature mortality. Evidence supports impairments in cognitive functions, specifically executive functions, as major contributors to falls. Worse performance on dual-task assessments that involve executive functions, such as walking while performing an attention demanding task, predict falls in non-demented older adults. The prefrontal cortex (PFC), a key structure for performing executive functions, also plays a vital role in control of cognition and mobility, indicating its important role in fall risk. Although the PFC is recognized as a potentially important contributor to falls, conventional neuroimaging techniques cannot image the brain during motion, leaving a gap in the understanding of underlying neural processes that might predict fall risk, and necessitated the use of newer approaches that can be used to study people while they walk, such as the functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS).</p>
<p>The primary goal of the study was to determine whether brain activity in the PFC measured during walking predicts falls in high-functioning older adults. We selected a high-functioning group of community-dwelling older adults enrolled in a prospective aging study at Albert Einstein College of Medicine to evaluate early brain activation changes that predict falls. Task-related changes in oxygen levels in the PFC were measured using fNIRS during single-task conditions (normal pace walking and standing while reciting alternate letters of the alphabet), and a dual-task condition (walking while reciting alternate letters of the alphabet). Over the 50-month study period 71 of the 166 participants reported 116 falls. People who had increases in brain activity levels during the dual-task condition were 32 percent more likely to fall. Brain activity levels during both the cognitive or motor single task conditions did not predict fall risk.</p>
<p>These findings provide evidence that brain activity patterns during cognitively demanding assessments predict falls in older adults and may not be elicited by more simple tasks. From a clinical perspective, these findings suggest that there may be changes in brain activity before visible signs of clinical dysfunction and physical symptoms manifest in high-functioning people who are at risk of falls. In the future, a brain scan assessment such as fNIRS might be used to help predict falls in older adults. Clinicians may be able to use this information to recommend behavioral and lifestyle modifications or treatments for their patients that may reduce the risk of future falls.</p>
<p><strong>Figure 1. Participant completing fNIRS assessment.</strong></p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-750" src="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/AyersFigure.png" alt="" width="675" height="375" srcset="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/AyersFigure.png 675w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/AyersFigure-300x167.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 675px) 100vw, 675px" /></p>
<p><strong>Publication:</strong></p>
<p>Verghese J, Wang C, Ayers E, Izzetoglu M, Holtzer R. Brain activation in high-functioning older adults and falls Prospective cohort study. Neurology. 2017 Jan 10;88(2):191-7. <strong><u>http://www.neurology.org/content/88/2/191</u></strong></p></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_33">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_33  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_33  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h3>About the Author</h3></div>
			</div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_team_member et_pb_team_member_8 clearfix  et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_team_member_image et-waypoint et_pb_animation_off"><img decoding="async" width="474" height="243" src="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/AyersVerghese.png" alt="Emmeline Ayers, MPH and Joe Verghese, MBBS" srcset="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/AyersVerghese.png 474w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/AyersVerghese-300x154.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 474px) 100vw, 474px" class="wp-image-749" /></div>
				<div class="et_pb_team_member_description">
					<h4 class="et_pb_module_header">Emmeline Ayers, MPH and Joe Verghese, MBBS</h4>
					<p class="et_pb_member_position">Departments of Neurology1 and Medicine,2 Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York</p>
					<div><p>Emmeline Ayers is an Associate, The Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology. Her research interests are in understanding the role of gait and mobility in progression to dementia and cognitive decline in older adults.</p>
<p>Dr. Verghese is Professor of Neurology and Medicine, Murray D. Gross Memorial Faculty Scholar in Gerontology, Director, Resnick Gerontology Center, and Chief of the Integrated Divisions of Cognitive and Motor Aging (Neurology) and Geriatrics (Medicine). He is an expert in aging and the effects on mobility and cognition.</p></div>
					
				</div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				<div class="et_pb_bottom_inside_divider et-no-transition"></div>
			</div><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_17 et_pb_with_background et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_34">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_34  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_34  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h4><strong>Copyright</strong></h4>
<p>© 2018 by the author. Except as otherwise noted, the ISPGR blog, including its text and figures, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode</a>.</p></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_35 et_animated">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_35  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_35  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_dark">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h4><strong>ISPGR blog (ISSN 2561-4703)<br />
</strong></h4>
<p><strong>Are you interested in writing a blog post for the ISPGR website?  If so, please email the <a href="mailto:i&#115;&#112;gr&#64;i&#115;p&#103;r&#46;org?subject=ISPGR%20Blog%20Post">ISGPR Secretariat </a>with the following information:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>First and Last Name</strong></li>
<li><strong>Institution/Affiliation</strong></li>
<li><strong>Paper you will be referencing</strong></li>
</ul></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://ispgr.org/does-an-active-brain-predict-falls-in-high-functioning-older-adults/">Does an active brain predict falls in high-functioning older adults?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://ispgr.org">ISPGR</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can we stimulate the brain with electricity to improve balance and dual-task ability?</title>
		<link>https://ispgr.org/can-we-stimulate-the-brain-with-electricity-to-improve-balance-and-dual-task-ability/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PodiumAdmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 17:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ISPGR Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basic Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain imaging and activation during posture and gait]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cognitive motor interfrence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ispgr.org/?p=641</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://ispgr.org/can-we-stimulate-the-brain-with-electricity-to-improve-balance-and-dual-task-ability/">Can we stimulate the brain with electricity to improve balance and dual-task ability?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://ispgr.org">ISPGR</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_18 et_section_regular section_has_divider et_pb_bottom_divider" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_36">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_36  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_36  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><p>When standing or walking, we often perform additional cognitive tasks such as talking, reading or listening to a friend.  This “dual tasking” is critical to the completion of activities of daily living.  Dual-tasking often results in reduced performance in one or both tasks, especially in older adults. The observation that dual tasking comes at a “cost” to performance means that the involved tasks use shared brain networks. Strategies designed to increase brain network excitability and/or efficiency thus hold great promise to improve dual task capacity across the lifespan. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is one safe and non-invasive method that uses low-level electrical currents to temporarily change brain excitability. The purpose of this experiment was to determine the immediate effects of tDCS on dual task balance performance in older adults.</p>
<p>Thirty-seven adults aged 60-85 years completed two laboratory visits separated by one week.  They received 20-minutes of tDCS during each visit. On one visit, they received tDCS designed to increase the excitability of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex—a region closely linked to cognition and motor control.  On the other visit, they received “sham,” (i.e. placebo) stimulation.  Participants and study personnel were blinded to tDCS condition.  Before and after each tDCS session, participants completed a dual task paradigm comprising trials of standing and walking both with and without performance of a mental arithmetic task.  The Figure below illustrates the effects of tDCS on single- and dual-task standing postural sway in a selected participant.  Results indicated that real tDCS reduced the dual task cost to both standing postural sway area and walking speed compared to sham stimulation. It also effectively mitigated the cost of walking on performance within the serial subtraction task. Intriguingly, tDCS did not alter standing, walking, or serial-subtraction performance within single task conditions. The reduction in dual task costs was instead spurred by significantly improved performance in each outcome specifically within dual task conditions.</p>
<p>This study demonstrated for the first time that dual tasking performance can be enhanced by modulating prefrontal brain excitability using non-invasive electrical brain stimulation. These results suggest that following just 20 minutes of stimulation, older adults may be able to more safely stand and walk while completing additional, unrelated cognitive tasks.  These results also suggest that the cost of dual tasking is not a fixed, obligatory consequence of aging, and identify tDCS as a novel approach to preserving dual tasking and balance into old age.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-637" src="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/ManorFigure.png" alt="" width="597" height="461" srcset="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/ManorFigure.png 597w, https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/ManorFigure-300x232.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 597px) 100vw, 597px" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Publication</strong></p>
<p>Manor B, Zhou J, Jor’dan A, Zhang J, Fang J, Pascual-Leone A. (2016). Reduction of dual-task costs by noninvasive modulation of prefrontal activity in healthy elders. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. Doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00897.<br />
<a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26488591">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26488591</a></p></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_37">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_37  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_37  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h3>About the Author</h3></div>
			</div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_team_member et_pb_team_member_9 clearfix  et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_team_member_image et-waypoint et_pb_animation_off"><img decoding="async" width="172" height="170" src="https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Manor.png" alt="Brad Manor, PhD" class="wp-image-636" /></div>
				<div class="et_pb_team_member_description">
					<h4 class="et_pb_module_header">Brad Manor, PhD</h4>
					<p class="et_pb_member_position">Assistant Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School</p>
					<div><p>Brad Manor is the Director of the Mobility and Brain Function Research Program at Hebrew SeniorLife’s Institute for Aging Research and Harvard Medical School.  His research combines brain imaging, non-invasive brain stimulation, and advanced signal processing techniques to understand and enhance the neural control of balance in aging and disease.</p></div>
					
				</div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				<div class="et_pb_bottom_inside_divider et-no-transition"></div>
			</div><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_19 et_pb_with_background et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_38">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_38  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_38  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h4><strong>Copyright</strong></h4>
<p>© 2018 by the author. Except as otherwise noted, the ISPGR blog, including its text and figures, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode</a>.</p></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_39 et_animated">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_39  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_39  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_dark">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h4><strong>ISPGR blog (ISSN 2561-4703)<br />
</strong></h4>
<p><strong>Are you interested in writing a blog post for the ISPGR website?  If so, please email the <a href="mailto:i&#115;pg&#114;&#64;is&#112;g&#114;.o&#114;g?subject=ISPGR%20Blog%20Post">ISGPR Secretariat </a>with the following information:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>First and Last Name</strong></li>
<li><strong>Institution/Affiliation</strong></li>
<li><strong>Paper you will be referencing</strong></li>
</ul></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://ispgr.org/can-we-stimulate-the-brain-with-electricity-to-improve-balance-and-dual-task-ability/">Can we stimulate the brain with electricity to improve balance and dual-task ability?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://ispgr.org">ISPGR</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
